Mother’s Act: Is it a Violation of Informed Consent?

The Mother’s Act is the screening of pregnant women for any signs of mental illness, prior to giving birth and after birth.  The bill mandates use of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), shown to triple the number of women “diagnosed.”  The first question on the EPDS test is “I have been able to laugh and see the funny side of things.”  If a mother cannot laugh and see the funny side of things perhaps it is due to lack of sleep, (which will eventually improve), hormonal imbalances that can be addressed by the doctor or thyroid problems for which new mother’s should be regularly screened.  Mothers and family members should be educated on what to expect from being a new mother not drugged which results in additional mental and physical symptoms.  



The Mother’s Act bill which was before Congress already passed the House of Representatives and is now before the Senate.  It will definitely increase new mothers being prescribed antidepressants and antipsychotics, the most common treatment for women diagnosed with postpartum depression.  The worse case scenario would be the mother being prescribed electric shock treatments (I use the word treatments, but a better terms would be abuse or torture).



The Informed Consent Doctrine requires the following prior to doctors administering a procedure or treatment of a patient:

·     the nature of the procedure

·     the risks

·     the benefits

·     the availability of alternative treatment (including no treatment) and the risks and benefits thereof.



The doctor must provide the patient with this information while proposing a specific treatment.  The Mother’s Act violates Informed Consent because the test will be mandatory.  Write your senator today against The Mother’s Act.



Citizen’s Commission on Human Rights

“The Mother’s Act: Thalidomide Revisited?” by Fred A. Baughman, Jr., MD** & Amy Philo


This website may contain some copyrighted material. We reserve the right to reproduce such material under the Copyright Act, Title 17 US Code, Section 107, “Fair Use”, as we believe the public should be informed of such information so they can think for themselves rather than rely on advertisements. We gain no profit from such articles.

2 Responses to “Mother’s Act: Is it a Violation of Informed Consent?”

  1. Amy Philo Says:

    Here’s an informative piece I wrote for the Christian News Wire regarding Reid’s incorporation of this bill into his omnibus package. Either Harry Reid is a total tool and a clueless idiot, or he is a sinister, corrupt criminal. Nevertheless, we have to do something to awaken congress or kick most of them out and put in some new blood.

    Also see:

  2. Your Friend Says:


    Thanks for all the information!

    Though the bill did not pass this time combined with the other issues, I know we still have a battle up ahead, after the holidays. I hope everyone will read this. I will do what I can by posting updates. If you could supply us with a national link to find out where people can write, call or fax (in the U.S.), as the need arises, I would greatly appreciate it.

    Onwards and upwards!
    Your Friend

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: